Ground heat flux may play an important role in surface energy balance. In this study we evaluate the performance of the objective hysteresis model (OHM) for estimating ground heat flux from net radiation and compare it with the linear regression model. The experimental sites include residential roofs (concrete), campus grassland, agricultural grassland, and peat bog. Our field measurements show that the mean partition coefficient from net radiation to ground heat flux varied from 0.47 (concrete roof) to 0.079 (agricultural grassland). The mean hysteresis (lag) factors for residential roof, campus grassland, and peat bog were 0.55, 0.26, and -0.11 h, respectively; and the hysteresis factor at the agricultural site was only 0.032 h. However, the partition and hysteresis coefficients in the OHM were found to vary with time for the same surface. Our measurements and analysis show that when the hysteresis factor is larger than 0.11 h, ground heat flux estimates from net radiation can be improved (17-37% reduction in the root mean square error) by using OHM instead of a simple linear regression model.
View source
